|
Post by leanonmepart3 on Jul 12, 2004 5:12:15 GMT -5
Britney being such a whore,does anybody think she'll make a good mum.I bet thats where she's going.
|
|
|
Post by Cathal on Jul 13, 2004 16:24:06 GMT -5
Britney is great. These hate sites were made by Justin Timberlake fans I would imagine around the time she was going out with him, same thing happened with Willa Ford. Britney may not be a Whitney Houston like singer but she still has a passable voice, which I personally enjoy listening to. It's not amazing but it has something different to it, something that makes it appealing. The main thing about Britney is that she is a star! She is just the ultimate celebrity and I respect the way she makes a little (her voice) go a long way. She's consistently had excellent singles and in my opinion extremely enjoyable albums. She's wild but yet sweet and I just think she rocks! Christina is great too and is by far more talented but yet I still prefer Britney as do a lot of people and just goes to show the amount of appeal she has for people.
|
|
|
Post by Cathal on Jul 13, 2004 16:25:56 GMT -5
Britney being such a whore,does anybody think she'll make a good mum.I bet thats where she's going. How is Britney Spears a whore? Explain yourself please. I don't see Britney having two different kids with two different men a la Tash Hamilton, who you area fan of. And I resent bringing Natasha into it as I know nothing of her personal life but it's a little rich to be calling Britney a whore when you are a fan of Atomic Kitten.
|
|
|
Post by Smudge on Jul 15, 2004 16:59:45 GMT -5
Who cares if she is a talentless, unstable, stupid, crackfiend whore? She's a superstar.
|
|
si
Punter
Popjustice Almighty
What's a ballsy?
Posts: 219
|
Post by si on Jul 16, 2004 1:40:57 GMT -5
She is a talentless, unstable, stupid, crackfiend whore. She's a superstar.
|
|
|
Post by Control on Jul 16, 2004 23:54:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by MilkMonitor on Jul 17, 2004 4:09:31 GMT -5
She's as mad as a lorry and I love her all the more for it. Rushing into marriage not once but twice in the same year, cellulite, smoking, acne, probably drugged up to her tits...she's brilliant (although, obviously, I hope she's alright upstairs). Long live Britney.
|
|
Bootie
Punter
The only way is up, baby.
Posts: 705
|
Post by Bootie on Jul 17, 2004 4:53:34 GMT -5
Who cares if she is trailer trash...sh'e a cracking pop star and if nothing else keeps us all entertained bitching about her
|
|
RD
Punter
Posts: 114
|
Post by RD on Jul 28, 2004 14:49:48 GMT -5
Britney is great. These hate sites were made by Justin Timberlake fans I would imagine around the time she was going out with him, same thing happened with Willa Ford. Britney may not be a Whitney Houston like singer but she still has a passable voice, which I personally enjoy listening to. It's not amazing but it has something different to it, something that makes it appealing. The main thing about Britney is that she is a star! She is just the ultimate celebrity and I respect the way she makes a little (her voice) go a long way. She's consistently had excellent singles and in my opinion extremely enjoyable albums. She's wild but yet sweet and I just think she rocks! Christina is great too and is by far more talented but yet I still prefer Britney as do a lot of people and just goes to show the amount of appeal she has for people. Yeah, personally I'd be curious to see the number of ACTIVE Britney hate sites there are. The one's I've seen haven't been updated since like 2000/2001 and most of them say 'What does Justin see in her?'. Though without the publicity around her I don't think she would have lasted as long as she has!
|
|
RD
Punter
Posts: 114
|
Post by RD on Jul 28, 2004 14:51:20 GMT -5
Who cares if she is trailer trash...sh'e a cracking pop star and if nothing else keeps us all entertained bitching about her That's probably the most sensible thing said in this thread! If Britney didn't exsist who or what would all the haters talk about? The weather??
|
|
|
Post by leanonmepart3 on Jul 29, 2004 22:15:14 GMT -5
That's probably the most sensible thing said in this thread! If Britney didn't exsist who or what would all the haters talk about? The weather?? But she does exist and man what fun bitching about her ,but then again she of course is bitchfull enough.
|
|
monsta
Punter
Dazzler - If Tina Cousins was a mutant.
Posts: 567
|
Post by monsta on Jul 30, 2004 5:06:31 GMT -5
Britney must be given some sort of formal title purely for this photo alone: God.Bless.America.
|
|
Gwen
Punter
Posts: 5
|
Post by Gwen on Aug 30, 2004 15:42:17 GMT -5
tee hee hee, some people on here sound (I know I can't hear you, but you know what I mean) like Vicky Pollard from the ever fabulous Little Britain.
Onto the actual topic here, Miss Spears, I think Britney's fantastic. Not only has she managed to maintain such a high level of public interest for so long, a feat which not many recent pop acts have managed (think of all those pop idol/pop stars rejects!), but every now and then she releases a genuinely good single. Britney, I salute you.
I don't like that Federline dude though... he's a bit creepy...
|
|
digitalrogue
Punter
I throw de cards. De cards go boom.
Posts: 183
|
Post by digitalrogue on Aug 31, 2004 8:19:31 GMT -5
When Britney's accountant goes to bed at night I'm sure he chuckles. When Britney goes to bed after hearing from her accountant I'm sure it helps soothe all the evils done to her by photographers, knowing that she can call up David LaChapelle and get him to do an inspired photoshoot in which she will look as perfect as ever.
From a business perspective Britney is far more savvy than she appears - in effect she has followed Madonna/Esther's trend and transformed herself into someone that everyone has an opinion on, and is likely to have some knowledge of. Nobody ever said "Madonna? Who?" in her heyday (although these days, she may have achieved her aim be more famous than God, but not everyone believes in God either...), and you can be pretty sure that most people know who La Spears is too. She is a brand. We care enough to comment.
As for Christina, I think she's great too. Although the whole Aguilera vs. Spears "battle" (in the same way there was an East 17 vs. Take That or Busted vs. McFly, Kylie vs... err...) was clearly won by Britney, Christina is a fantastic singer and is also able to take the piss out of herself in a way that Britney perhaps isn't confident enough to. While Britney's songs reveal a girl who is talented yet afraid, Christina tends to affirm what is within and shout "I don't care." She then goes and stars in an advert for Virgin (geddit?!) mobile which I consider to be brilliant on a LaChapelle scale.
I salute them all.
|
|
|
Post by Cheeky Poof on Sept 1, 2004 13:04:41 GMT -5
I'm SICK of hearing people say Britney can't sing just because they don't like her, same with Posh. Britney spears CAN do things that Christina Aq does with her voice just not as fuckin loud & for thatI am glad. Just because a singers voice is loud DOES NOT mean it's good.
Footage from before she was a megastar shows she has power behind her voice and that she can sing, if she wasn't given songs like "Baby" & "Oops" that don't require a massive vocal from the age of 15 then perhaps she would have a Whitney style voice.
Now her looking like trash lately well it's Britney, it's probably a publicity stunt.
|
|
|
Post by veryjammy on Sept 9, 2004 19:30:31 GMT -5
Being incredibly fickle I found myself with nearly everything everyone said on here except for the bit about Xtinas meaningful lyrics.
Am i the only person who thought stripped was self-indulgent tosh; it certainly didnt deserve to sell THREE TIMES as many copies as in the zone. The key to its success was that they picked the 5 best songs while Jive couldn't pick a hit single if they tried. Anyone who bought stripped would then be subjected to a mature (boring) album of tedious piano-led ballads and soul searching *yawn*
Long live the britney car crash show. her voice is often obscenely processed but her singles are almost consistently great and, as many others have pointed out, she really is living the bad girl life that xtina and co pretended to live.
The difference between xtina and britney is that xtina will live or die by the quality of her songs; people aren't actually interested in her. britney will live despite a couple of dodgy songs because people genuinely want to see what she does next. whether you consider this a good thing or not is debatable but I would say britney is the only pop star at the moment that i could see having as long lasting a career as madonna, miming or no miming.
|
|
|
Post by Spixxy on Sept 10, 2004 11:59:27 GMT -5
I'm SICK of hearing people say Britney can't sing just because they don't like her, same with Posh. Britney spears CAN do things that Christina Aq does with her voice just not as fuckin loud & for thatI am glad. Just because a singers voice is loud DOES NOT mean it's good. Footage from before she was a megastar shows she has power behind her voice and that she can sing, if she wasn't given songs like "Baby" & "Oops" that don't require a massive vocal from the age of 15 then perhaps she would have a Whitney style voice. Now her looking like trash lately well it's Britney, it's probably a publicity stunt. Thank you! I love you!
|
|
Dudie
Punter
What's not to like?
Posts: 685
|
Post by Dudie on Sept 10, 2004 15:19:56 GMT -5
Well for what it's worth I love them both but in different ways. I love Xina's voice, her music, her raunch and her chameleon looks. I love Britney for some of the music and her attempts to be like Xina which shows how totally insecure and vulnerable she is. I'm feeling more and more protective of Britney actually. Give her a break.
|
|
|
Post by Bellefirecrazy on Sept 10, 2004 16:15:55 GMT -5
I like both but think Britney is way better. Xtina has a better voice but sometimes I can't stand it when she sings live cause you goes up and down in key like I don't know what and she doesn't sing even remotely similar to the studio version. I have heard Britney sing live on tv and in concert and she was alright. I have a live version of Crazy on my c and video footage of Everytime live. She is a far better dancer and think it's amazing the stuff that she can do. britney is what you call a 'real' artist. Someone who writes music which is catchy, fun, not too personal and puts on a grade A show!!
|
|
Lovebomb
Punter
That Special Something
Posts: 371
|
Post by Lovebomb on Sept 10, 2004 16:17:13 GMT -5
I love Britney for some of the music and her attempts to be like Xina.... When has Britney attempted to be like Xtina?
|
|
Scruffy
Punter
Whys you gots to be such a playa hater?
Posts: 1,690
|
Post by Scruffy on Sept 10, 2004 16:30:53 GMT -5
Well for what it's worth I love them both but in different ways. I love Xina's voice, her music, her raunch and her chameleon looks. I love Britney for some of the music and her attempts to be like Xina which shows how totally insecure and vulnerable she is. I'm feeling more and more protective of Britney actually. Give her a break. Actually while agree with about Xtina for the most part her chameleon looks are much more insecurity revealing than Britney. Britney really hasn't changed an awful lot. Yeah she's a bit blonder. A bit sexier. that's it. Christina has changed image so many times because she knows she hasn't got the same appeal of this is me that Britney and constantly needs to make people look at her. Her style changes always reek of desperation to me. Having said that she is I think a more fun performer than Britney in that she has swagger and attitude to burn on stage. Britney is good in her dancing and the spectacle she creates but she distances the crowd because she doesn't sing etc. Christina is really kick ass live and that's not something pick up on alot. As for the Stripped outselling ITZ thing. In the states at least ITZ sold as much as it did in about 6 months. Not sure about Europe but ITZ has done really well.
|
|
|
Post by Cheeky Poof on Sept 11, 2004 3:33:02 GMT -5
Bless, I heart you too. Anyway yeah veryjammy I agree about Xtina's album being quite boring. i find myself skipping 5 songs at a time to get to the next one I like. Where as I can listen to all Brintey's albums without skipping a song. At the end of the day it boils down to personal taste.
|
|
Dudie
Punter
What's not to like?
Posts: 685
|
Post by Dudie on Sept 11, 2004 3:54:00 GMT -5
Yep it is about personal taste. When I said that Britney was trying to be more like Xina I really meant by her going the raunchy route at her last concert à la Dirrty and trying to generally to sex up her image. As for the insecurity angle of people changing their looks I'm not so sure. At school it was always the most confident ones who lead the pack with their style and when the pack were wearing/dressing how they did they'd change it completely and push the boundaries in a different direction. You have to be pretty sure of yourself to do that and not give a shit. That's how Xina comes across actually, like she doesn't give a shit. Britney comes across exactly the opposite. But as I said I like both. Xina's album is anything but boring as far as I'm concerned though.
|
|
|
Post by Spixxy on Sept 11, 2004 13:42:51 GMT -5
Don't think Britney is just some push over that does whatever managment says and shes some lost girl... One night while they were shooting, LaChapelle says, Spears' manager, Larry Rudolph, walked in at 2 a.m. to find her posing in her bra and panties. Rudolph demanded to know what was going on. "Britney said, 'Yeah, I don't feel comfortable,' " says the photographer. "At first I felt betrayed. But as soon as Larry walked out, Britney said, 'Lock the door' and unbuttoned her shirt wide open." I love that bitch! Their talking about this pic from 1999 btw You can read the rest about the shoot at.. www.rollingstone.com/news/story?id=6478020
|
|
Scruffy
Punter
Whys you gots to be such a playa hater?
Posts: 1,690
|
Post by Scruffy on Sept 12, 2004 14:28:13 GMT -5
That's brilliant. The point about Xtina I'm trying to make is her image changes have little to do with anything else about her, they don't really say anything but LOOK AT ME! and the fact that she doesn't give a shit is nice but she spends as much time trying to prove herself in interviews etc that you think maybe she does. Britney never has to do that, her image has progressed fairly natural and I don't see her trying so hard to impress people, yeah there's the controversy but she backs it up with good tunes and a strong knowledge of what she's about so it balances out.
|
|
|
Post by Spixxy on Sept 16, 2004 8:24:18 GMT -5
After seeing the brillance of the MP video, she does not deserve to be here!
|
|
|
Post by Sippe on Sept 16, 2004 13:07:28 GMT -5
I like them both, Xtina and Britney, but Britney does a lot a lot a lot better music, has a lot better image (even if I don´t like about lolita -image!) and so on...
And Britney can sing. The thing is that her songs are that kind of songs which sound better if you sing them sexy. And as for the smoking, Britney´s smoked for about 4 years now, right? That has not THAT big effect for her lunges, hope so... But I´m still afraid of her lungs. She has a bad breathing technique (or then she just acts to have to make her music more sexy), she smokes and she sings with un-natural way. So maybe she doensn´t have her BIG voice anymore... Anyway, I hope she starts singing naturally some-record.
And I totally agree with ITZ and Stripped! I bought Stripped because it costed only 2 euros on a flea-market... And *yawn* it is boring. I´m not saying it would not be good, I like it, but if youé not in a right mood you just get sleepy if you listen to it... What I know, ITZ sold worse than Stripped in Europe, but not *three* times, if I´m right. And yes, Dirrty, Beautiful, Fighter, CHUD and TVW were the best singles from the album, released in great times, the videos included different kinds of Christina, like Fighter-moth-Xtina, Dirrty-whore-Xtina, CHUD-sexy-Xtina, TVW-classical-Xtina and Boring-Beautiful-Xtina, when all the Britney videos rode with sex.
|
|
MissGhettoFabulous
Punter
Get well soon Miss Kylie! I am sendin' you lotsa love, boo.
Posts: 176
|
Post by MissGhettoFabulous on Oct 3, 2004 10:38:20 GMT -5
I am gettin' very tired of Miss Britney now. She is givin' poor white trash a bad name and the thing is, she ain't even poor white trash! Miss Britney had a good upbringing in a nice neighbourhood and all that ish but the real poor white trash in America have more class then her these days. And she can't sing! Y'all here her on that Bobby Brown song? If Bobby Brown could focus durin' his latest crack session and actually heard what that voice sounds like on that song he would be gettin' her arrested because she has murdered that song y'all!
|
|
|
Post by toby3000 on Oct 6, 2004 18:53:33 GMT -5
i love britney!
Christins album was DULL!! and she's so eager to show off the fact that she can sing, which means she walblkes continuously.
Pop stars don't need to sing that well. Madonna for example. they need to be INTERESTING. And Britney's interesting. Christina needs to slack off Britney to be interesting.
She's given us some of the best pop song ever. Hit me baby..., Toxic, Slave 4 U.
Britney puts on one hell of a show. And i dont give a shit that she mimed. I'd rather have a fuck-off show than one that's live and dull as shit.
AND she's not exactly off the rails. god, she doesnt dress l;ike a glamour puss every day (she diesnt need to), and she smokes!! call the fucking police.
|
|
|
Post by Electrobix on Oct 7, 2004 7:40:59 GMT -5
Christina needs to slack off Britney to be interesting. I've never understood this attitude; that Christina copies Britney and needs her to continue her career. How so? Their music is different and I can't think of one example of where Britney has done something controversial and Christina has done the same (apart from the kissing Madonna thing but that wasn't exactly copying).
|
|